Nonprofit leaders want to approach every single possible funder who shares an interest in their cause.
The problem is the world of grant writing trains us to grind out the same old grant applications to 20 or fewer funders every year when – in truth – we could be producing so much more for our employer’s time and money.
The profession of grant writing is grossly inefficient!
Charities do not know how to write a successful grant – even the “professionals” they hire do not seem to know the “formula” for a winning grant. They rely on ancient information from “experts” who have never actually won a grant in the past 10 years…yet the grant writers they hire continue to parrot their bad advice.
Poor return on investment.
Embarrassment at board meetings.
It just isn’t fair.
Why is there no urgency?
Isn’t it time to do something different?
Accordingly, what if we told you there is a way to win many more grants? You do not need to know anything about writing grants… all you need is a willingness to implement a simple and powerful system. Indeed, it is a maverick system that is faster, more efficient, and less expensive than the traditional model – would not you at least want to hear about it? Join these clients by scheduling a free consultation now.
Here’s how it works!
Dr. Drew totally gets the frustration that charity leaders feel knowing that grant writing could be 5 or 10 times more productive if only we set higher standards.
- Dr. Drew has no patience with the delaying excuse that things “…have always been done this way.”
- Too often, Dr. Drew witnessed a sickening malaise which dragged down the charity, while key staff members maintained their status and salaries in a stress free environment.
- Where in all of this, Dr. Drew asked himself, is a normal respect for the best interests of the client or the donor?
- Dr. Drew knows there is a better and faster way to succeed in the field of grant writing. He taught himself these techniques by getting great at writing grants quickly.
- Dr. Drew thrived in a consulting practice where he raised $54 million, largely on his own, depending mainly on well thought out improvements in his speed and efficiency as a grant writer.